<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Keep Twitter Free! [of rules]</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.larkin.net.au/2008/05/03/keep-twitter-free/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.larkin.net.au/2008/05/03/keep-twitter-free/</link>
	<description>Thoughts on teaching, technology, learning and life in an era of change.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 20:26:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: John Larkin</title>
		<link>http://blog.larkin.net.au/2008/05/03/keep-twitter-free/comment-page-1/#comment-490</link>
		<dc:creator>John Larkin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 08:38:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.larkin.net.au/?p=662#comment-490</guid>
		<description>Hi Mathew

Thank you for your vote of support. There have been similar threads elsewhere in relation to the use of the read-write web by educators.

Generally it seems the consensus appears that we need to apply commonsense and simply do the right thing and that a set of rules or guides is not really all that necessary. We are all grown up I guess.

Cheers, John.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Mathew</p>
<p>Thank you for your vote of support. There have been similar threads elsewhere in relation to the use of the read-write web by educators.</p>
<p>Generally it seems the consensus appears that we need to apply commonsense and simply do the right thing and that a set of rules or guides is not really all that necessary. We are all grown up I guess.</p>
<p>Cheers, John.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mathew</title>
		<link>http://blog.larkin.net.au/2008/05/03/keep-twitter-free/comment-page-1/#comment-488</link>
		<dc:creator>Mathew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 01:46:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.larkin.net.au/?p=662#comment-488</guid>
		<description>Here here.  Use it how you want to.  People can choose to follow or not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here here.  Use it how you want to.  People can choose to follow or not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Larkin</title>
		<link>http://blog.larkin.net.au/2008/05/03/keep-twitter-free/comment-page-1/#comment-478</link>
		<dc:creator>John Larkin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 21:34:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.larkin.net.au/?p=662#comment-478</guid>
		<description>Kate and Bill, thank you for the comments. I appreciate your compliment there as well Kate. It is nice to awake on a Sunday morning, grab a cuppa and see that their is a compliment waiting for you in your in box.

Bill, yes, it is true that the net does allow us to make choices if an individual annoys or offends. We can simply unsubscribe or block them. No-one is hurt or affected by those simple actions. In the workplace it is a little different. We need &#039;rules&#039; written or otherwise that guide our interactions professionally and personally. If someone offends or annoys at work we cannot simply block them or unsubscribe the individual from the workplace.

It is an irony that we do guide our students in the use of the blogs. I usually ask them to apply commonsense and even to read out aloud to themselves what they have written. When they hear their own words it can have an impact on how they perceive them.

How to best to balance the need to introduce and the opportunity to explore? I do not have a simple ready-made solution at hand yet I suggest commonsense and the sharing of good examples. Show the students that you have faith in them to do the right thing and the students themselves will often set examples among their own peer group. They have the capacity to sort themselves out as well. They all know the difference between right and wrong.

Thanks for your thoughtful words Bill. I am happy to share in this exchange,

cheers, John.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kate and Bill, thank you for the comments. I appreciate your compliment there as well Kate. It is nice to awake on a Sunday morning, grab a cuppa and see that their is a compliment waiting for you in your in box.</p>
<p>Bill, yes, it is true that the net does allow us to make choices if an individual annoys or offends. We can simply unsubscribe or block them. No-one is hurt or affected by those simple actions. In the workplace it is a little different. We need &#8216;rules&#8217; written or otherwise that guide our interactions professionally and personally. If someone offends or annoys at work we cannot simply block them or unsubscribe the individual from the workplace.</p>
<p>It is an irony that we do guide our students in the use of the blogs. I usually ask them to apply commonsense and even to read out aloud to themselves what they have written. When they hear their own words it can have an impact on how they perceive them.</p>
<p>How to best to balance the need to introduce and the opportunity to explore? I do not have a simple ready-made solution at hand yet I suggest commonsense and the sharing of good examples. Show the students that you have faith in them to do the right thing and the students themselves will often set examples among their own peer group. They have the capacity to sort themselves out as well. They all know the difference between right and wrong.</p>
<p>Thanks for your thoughtful words Bill. I am happy to share in this exchange,</p>
<p>cheers, John.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
