<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wikipedia verifies via Google search too</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.larkin.net.au/2008/07/07/wikipedia-verifies-via-google-search-too/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.larkin.net.au/2008/07/07/wikipedia-verifies-via-google-search-too/</link>
	<description>Thoughts on teaching, learning, technology and life in an era of change.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 13:58:56 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ann Onnymouse</title>
		<link>http://blog.larkin.net.au/2008/07/07/wikipedia-verifies-via-google-search-too/#comment-596</link>
		<dc:creator>Ann Onnymouse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 21:20:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.larkin.net.au/?p=702#comment-596</guid>
		<description>Of course googling is a good method of validating information; you look for info and check if it's reasonable. If it is, you've got validation. But if you google, and find *nothing whatsoever* then you have a rather likely lack of validation.

I think it's cute that you guys are trying to save this article. Too bad it won't help. You're just gonna get the topic name protected from creation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course googling is a good method of validating information; you look for info and check if it&#8217;s reasonable. If it is, you&#8217;ve got validation. But if you google, and find *nothing whatsoever* then you have a rather likely lack of validation.</p>
<p>I think it&#8217;s cute that you guys are trying to save this article. Too bad it won&#8217;t help. You&#8217;re just gonna get the topic name protected from creation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
