<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Can one comment too often?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.larkin.net.au/2008/10/13/can-one-comment-too-often/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.larkin.net.au/2008/10/13/can-one-comment-too-often/</link>
	<description>Thoughts on teaching, technology, learning and life in an era of change.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 10:49:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ken Allan</title>
		<link>http://blog.larkin.net.au/2008/10/13/can-one-comment-too-often/comment-page-1/#comment-773</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Allan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 09:32:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.larkin.net.au/?p=780#comment-773</guid>
		<description>Kia ora John!

Well, I think you have a few answers to your question and most of them go the same way. I am an avid commenter, a bit like Sue. I agree with the idea that blogs ARE for commenting. If the blogger doesn&#039;t want comments they can switch comments off and have themselves a web1.0 page.

Yet my recent experience has been that not every blogger likes lots of comments, especially if they engage in conversation - such as they do frequently on Clay Burell&#039;s posts.

Some of my comments have been long enough to be good size posts. But some bloggers like that.

You can&#039;t win them all. I&#039;d better keep this seemly.

Well done for stimulating some interesting looooong comments.

Ka kite
from Middle-earth</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kia ora John!</p>
<p>Well, I think you have a few answers to your question and most of them go the same way. I am an avid commenter, a bit like Sue. I agree with the idea that blogs ARE for commenting. If the blogger doesn&#8217;t want comments they can switch comments off and have themselves a web1.0 page.</p>
<p>Yet my recent experience has been that not every blogger likes lots of comments, especially if they engage in conversation &#8211; such as they do frequently on Clay Burell&#8217;s posts.</p>
<p>Some of my comments have been long enough to be good size posts. But some bloggers like that.</p>
<p>You can&#8217;t win them all. I&#8217;d better keep this seemly.</p>
<p>Well done for stimulating some interesting looooong comments.</p>
<p>Ka kite<br />
from Middle-earth</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Larkin</title>
		<link>http://blog.larkin.net.au/2008/10/13/can-one-comment-too-often/comment-page-1/#comment-772</link>
		<dc:creator>John Larkin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2008 23:13:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.larkin.net.au/?p=780#comment-772</guid>
		<description>Hi Clay,
Thank you. My comments are next to &#039;godliness&#039;... does that make us two parts of the Holy Trinity. Which of the three are you? Who is the third? 

Yes, my comments were being spammed. I am not sure why. Perhaps too many were short and pithy. Who knows? Perhaps some were deliberately spammed by blog authors?

Regarding blog burn-out. I sent you an email. Essentially, do not let it concern you. Blogging is not an obligation but an outlet. Please read my email and go from there.

Cheers, John.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Clay,<br />
Thank you. My comments are next to &#8216;godliness&#8217;&#8230; does that make us two parts of the Holy Trinity. Which of the three are you? Who is the third? </p>
<p>Yes, my comments were being spammed. I am not sure why. Perhaps too many were short and pithy. Who knows? Perhaps some were deliberately spammed by blog authors?</p>
<p>Regarding blog burn-out. I sent you an email. Essentially, do not let it concern you. Blogging is not an obligation but an outlet. Please read my email and go from there.</p>
<p>Cheers, John.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clay Burell</title>
		<link>http://blog.larkin.net.au/2008/10/13/can-one-comment-too-often/comment-page-1/#comment-771</link>
		<dc:creator>Clay Burell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2008 17:36:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.larkin.net.au/?p=780#comment-771</guid>
		<description>John, John, some people can comment too much - but not you. Your comments are next to godliness (especially the &quot;blue&quot; ones).

A question I&#039;ll return serve with: What do you do when you start to burn out on blogging? I&#039;m sort of there (and that&#039;s why I&#039;m shaky with replying to comments - I tire easily these days).

I think it has to do with my national politics, among other things.

And btw, your comments often do get caught in spam, for some reason. More than most.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John, John, some people can comment too much &#8211; but not you. Your comments are next to godliness (especially the &#8220;blue&#8221; ones).</p>
<p>A question I&#8217;ll return serve with: What do you do when you start to burn out on blogging? I&#8217;m sort of there (and that&#8217;s why I&#8217;m shaky with replying to comments &#8211; I tire easily these days).</p>
<p>I think it has to do with my national politics, among other things.</p>
<p>And btw, your comments often do get caught in spam, for some reason. More than most.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
