<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fix for broken embedded Jaiku links</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.larkin.net.au/2008/10/26/fix-for-broken-embedded-jaiku-links/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.larkin.net.au/2008/10/26/fix-for-broken-embedded-jaiku-links/</link>
	<description>Thoughts on teaching, technology, learning and life in an era of change.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 28 Aug 2011 03:48:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Larkin</title>
		<link>http://blog.larkin.net.au/2008/10/26/fix-for-broken-embedded-jaiku-links/comment-page-1/#comment-786</link>
		<dc:creator>John Larkin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 06:01:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.larkin.net.au/?p=788#comment-786</guid>
		<description>Kevin, you are welcome. Jaiku&#039;s lifestreaming capability is excellent. It is useful that all your feeds can appear in one place is such an elegant manner. The word balloons, interactivity and the design in appealing. I guess it is web 2.0 eye candy. 

But what the heck, I could fully customise the colour palette so that it would match my web site. I could also cram it into my narrow sidebar by reducing the width. It sits there looking inviting. It does act like a &quot;What&#039;s New?&quot; The Twitter badges look ugly in comparison.

I need to add a few more streams to the Jaiku. Sure Twitter is more popular and it serves that purpose. It even survived some rough patches this year. But Jaiku is a very different beast for me. It is my little lifestreaming window.

Cheers, John</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kevin, you are welcome. Jaiku&#8217;s lifestreaming capability is excellent. It is useful that all your feeds can appear in one place is such an elegant manner. The word balloons, interactivity and the design in appealing. I guess it is web 2.0 eye candy. </p>
<p>But what the heck, I could fully customise the colour palette so that it would match my web site. I could also cram it into my narrow sidebar by reducing the width. It sits there looking inviting. It does act like a &#8220;What&#8217;s New?&#8221; The Twitter badges look ugly in comparison.</p>
<p>I need to add a few more streams to the Jaiku. Sure Twitter is more popular and it serves that purpose. It even survived some rough patches this year. But Jaiku is a very different beast for me. It is my little lifestreaming window.</p>
<p>Cheers, John</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://blog.larkin.net.au/2008/10/26/fix-for-broken-embedded-jaiku-links/comment-page-1/#comment-785</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 23:35:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.larkin.net.au/?p=788#comment-785</guid>
		<description>John, thanks for the mention! Jaiku held so much promise; I certainly love the features it had, including the built-in lifestreaming capability. I guess twitter is still the most predominent microblogging tool around, it gained traction with the American microcelebs and it was simply the power of network effect from there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John, thanks for the mention! Jaiku held so much promise; I certainly love the features it had, including the built-in lifestreaming capability. I guess twitter is still the most predominent microblogging tool around, it gained traction with the American microcelebs and it was simply the power of network effect from there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
