<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: David Bowie ~ Station To Station Full Colour Artwork Revisited</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.larkin.net.au/2009/04/22/david-bowie-station-to-station-full-colour-artwork-revisited/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.larkin.net.au/2009/04/22/david-bowie-station-to-station-full-colour-artwork-revisited/</link>
	<description>Thoughts on teaching, technology, learning and life in an era of change.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 28 Aug 2011 03:48:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Larkin</title>
		<link>http://blog.larkin.net.au/2009/04/22/david-bowie-station-to-station-full-colour-artwork-revisited/comment-page-1/#comment-1016</link>
		<dc:creator>John Larkin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 06:54:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.larkin.net.au/?p=877#comment-1016</guid>
		<description>Well, ladies and gentleman. I shall be closing this blog post to further comments in order to avoid the sort of circuitous debate that has occurred on the other post that covered the same topic. This is an unusual step for me yet this is a prerogative that I possess and I have chosen to exercise it. 

To my detractors, it seems to me that there are people that actually believe that &quot;all men are equal but some are more equal than others&quot;.

Cheers, John</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, ladies and gentleman. I shall be closing this blog post to further comments in order to avoid the sort of circuitous debate that has occurred on the other post that covered the same topic. This is an unusual step for me yet this is a prerogative that I possess and I have chosen to exercise it. </p>
<p>To my detractors, it seems to me that there are people that actually believe that &#8220;all men are equal but some are more equal than others&#8221;.</p>
<p>Cheers, John</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Larkin</title>
		<link>http://blog.larkin.net.au/2009/04/22/david-bowie-station-to-station-full-colour-artwork-revisited/comment-page-1/#comment-1011</link>
		<dc:creator>John Larkin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 23:00:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.larkin.net.au/?p=877#comment-1011</guid>
		<description>Regarding the artwork with white lettering... perhaps &#039;red&#039; was not applied to this proof yet all four colours, namely CYMK, appear in the colour bars below.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding the artwork with white lettering&#8230; perhaps &#8216;red&#8217; was not applied to this proof yet all four colours, namely CYMK, appear in the colour bars below.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Larkin</title>
		<link>http://blog.larkin.net.au/2009/04/22/david-bowie-station-to-station-full-colour-artwork-revisited/comment-page-1/#comment-1009</link>
		<dc:creator>John Larkin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 21:33:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.larkin.net.au/?p=877#comment-1009</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comment Paul. Yes, a comment on another forum indicates that this current proof or slick may be one without the colour red, (possibly a mix of yellow and magenta?). Hence the lack of &#039;red&#039; in the title and the back of the sleeve, which featured red print in its entirety on the reverse. Michael did mention the proofs with the fewer colours in his earlier comment on the other post. WIll wait and see.
Cheers, John.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comment Paul. Yes, a comment on another forum indicates that this current proof or slick may be one without the colour red, (possibly a mix of yellow and magenta?). Hence the lack of &#8216;red&#8217; in the title and the back of the sleeve, which featured red print in its entirety on the reverse. Michael did mention the proofs with the fewer colours in his earlier comment on the other post. WIll wait and see.<br />
Cheers, John.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
